DARI KECEPATAN KE KEAMANAN: EVOLUSI PINJAMAN ONLINE DAN PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Rengga Yudha Santoso Universitas PGRI Mpu Sindok Author
  • Ajeng Ratri Kirana Dewi Universitas PGRI Mpu Sindok Author

Keywords:

Fintech, Online Lending, Consumer Protection, OJK Regulation, Personal Data Protection Law

Abstract

The rapid development of financial technology (fintech) in Indonesia has significantly transformed the landscape of digital financing, particularly through online lending (peer-to-peer lending). These platforms provide quick and convenient access to funds, especially for underbanked segments, but also create new risks such as high interest rates, unethical collection practices, and misuse of personal data. This study aims to analyze the evolution of online lending services from a focus on speed toward security, and to examine the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks and consumer protection in Indonesia. A qualitative literature review method was employed, drawing from Scopus-indexed journals, Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations, Law No. 27/2022 on Personal Data Protection, and international policy reports. The findings reveal that OJK Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022 has strengthened governance standards, interest rate caps, and consumer protection mechanisms; however, challenges remain in supervising illegal platforms, ensuring cost transparency, and improving digital financial literacy. In conclusion, the evolution of Indonesia’s online lending sector reflects a shift from speed-driven innovation to security and sustainability, where effective consumer protection relies on robust regulation, inter-agency coordination, and public awareness. Policy recommendations include enhancing technology-based supervision (regtech), expanding financial literacy programs, and conducting impact evaluations of existing regulations on consumer welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gai, K., Qiu, M., & Sun, X. (2018). A survey on FinTech. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 103, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.011

Laukkanen, T. (2017). Mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(7), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2015-0189

Lee, D. K. C., & Teo, E. G. S. (2015). Emergence of FinTech and the LASIC principles. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3), 1–26.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi.

Rahman, M., & Sari, D. (2021). Regulatory challenges in fintech development: Case of Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0469

Saputra, I., & Hidayat, R. (2022). Legal protection for consumers in online loan transactions. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(1), 33–45.

Zavolokina, L., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2016). FinTech transformation: How IT-enabled innovations shape the financial sector. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016).

Zhou, Y., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2021). Regulating digital financial services: Challenges and opportunities. Law and Financial Markets Review, 15(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2021.1913631

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm? SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553

Chambers. (2025). Indonesia: An introduction to FinTech legal law. (Ringkasan regulasi).

Dinh, V. (2023). Determinants affecting digital financial consumer protection. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 86, 101–118.

DLA Piper. (2025). Data protection laws of the world: Indonesia. (Ikhtisar UU PDP 27/2022).

Fitch Ratings. (2024, February 26). Indonesia P2P lending dashboard. (Kebijakan affordability cap & pembatasan pinjaman).

Global Legal Insights. (2025). Fintech laws and regulations—Indonesia. (Evolusi regulasi fintech & P2P).

ICLG. (2025). Fintech laws and regulations—Indonesia. (Peralihan dari POJK 77/2016 ke POJK 10/2022).

Kholidah, H., Astuti, P., & Sari, D. (2022). A bibliometric mapping of peer-to-peer lending research. Heliyon, 8(12), e11842.

Reuters. (2023, November 9). Indonesia to cap interest on loans given by fintech companies. (Roadmap bunga harian).

Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2021). Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06782.

Zhou, X., Zhang, W., & Xie, J. (2021). FinTech innovation regulation based on reputation theory. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101603.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Downloads

Published

2025-10-12