DETERMINANTS OF GENERATION Z’S INTEREST IN CHOOSING A CAREER IN THE FORMAL SECTOR (A Study in Denpasar City)

Authors

  • Adrian Maulana Undergraduate Economics Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Denpasar Author
  • Ni Putu Martini Dewi Undergraduate Economics Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Denpasar Author

Keywords:

formal sector, Generation Z, education level, socioeconomic status, income.

Abstract

The formal sector is an important pillar of national economic stability as it offers a structured work system, legal certainty, and social protection. However, in the digital era, the career preferences of young generations have begun to shift, creating an urgency to understand the reasons why Generation Z continues to consider the formal sector amid the rapid growth of informal sector employment. This study aims to analyze the determinants of Generation Z’s interest in Denpasar City in choosing a career in the formal sector by examining the effect of education level (X1), socioeconomic status (X2), and income (X3). The urgency of this study lies in the importance of mapping young labor force expectations to support more effective and sustainable employment absorption policies. This study employs a quantitative approach with data collected through questionnaires from 100 Generation Z respondents in Denpasar City using a purposive sampling technique. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis to test the effect of variables partially and simultaneously. The results show that simultaneously, education level, socioeconomic status, and income have a significant effect on Generation Z’s interest in choosing a career in the formal sector. Partially, all three variables also have a positive and significant effect. Income is the most dominant factor, emphasizing that financial security is the primary motivator for Generation Z, which is known for being realistic in future planning. These findings imply that academic qualifications and financial expectations constitute Generation Z’s strategic foundation in choosing a professional career path. The government must ensure equitable access to formal employment through inclusive policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, E. N., Isnaini, I., Sukamti, S., & Amalia, L. N. (2018). Pengaruh tingkat pendidikan terhadap tingkat kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kelurahan Kesatrian Kota Malang. Technomedia Journal, 3 (1), 58–72.

Andersson, M. (2018). An Odd Ladder to Climb: Socioeconomic Differences Across Levels of Subjective Social Status. Social Indicators Research, 136, 621-643.

Astawa, I., & Budhi, M. (2022). PENGARUH PDRB PER KAPITA, JUMLAH PENDUDUK YANG BEKERJA, INFLASI TERHADAP PAD KOTA DENPASAR. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana. https://doi.org/10.24843/eep.2022.v11.i11.p06.

Astuti, R. P. F. (2016). Pengaruh status sosial ekonomi orang tua, literasi ekonomi dan life style terhadap perilaku konsumsi mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan ekonomi IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 3(2), 49–58.

Ayuni, F., & Awaludin, A. (2025). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Generasi Z Bekerja Pada Sektor Pertanian Dan Dampak Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. Journal of Economics Development Research, 1(1), 26-37.

Azizah, E. W., Sudarti, S., & Kusuma, H. (2018). Pengaruh pendidikan, pendapatan perkapita dan jumlah penduduk terhadap kemiskinan di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi JIE, 2(1), 167–180.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Analisis profil penduduk Indonesia.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Pendapatan Februari 2024

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Angkatan Kerja (AK) Menurut Golongan Umur 2024.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Ekonomi Indonesia tahun 2024 tumbuh 5,03 persen (c-to-c).

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Persentase Tenaga Kerja Formal Menurut Provinsi (Persen), 2024.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Tingkat pengangguran terbuka (TPT) sebesar 4,76 persen, rata-rata upah buruh sebesar 3,09 juta rupiah.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Denpasar. (2024). Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Kelompok Umur dan Jenis Kelamin di Kota Denpasar 2023.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Denpasar. (2025). Denpasar Municipality in figures 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Denpasar.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Bali. (2025). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan di Provinsi Bali Agustus 2024.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Bali. (2025). PDRB Kabupaten Kota di Provinsi Bali Atas Dasar Harga Berlaku 2024.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2024). Pekerja Formal dan Informal Provinsi Jawa Barat 2023.

Bado, B., Tahir, T., & Supatminingsih, T. (2023). Studi Social Climber Gen-Z dan Perilaku Ekonominya. Journal of Economic Education and Entrepreneurship Studies, 4(1), 503–526.

Bairwa, A., & Sofi, I. (2025). Unveiling social disparities in employment and wages: a labour market segmentation analysis of India’s IT industry. International Journal of Social Economics.

Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. (2021). Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development.

Bitchoga, N. (2020). Cameroon: structural analysis of economy on the basis of a sector approach.

Brožová, D. (2018). The Minimum Wage in the Neoclassical and the Behavioural Labour Market Theory. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia.

Caplan, B. (2018). The Case against Education.

Cova, J. (2025). State intervention in low-wage work: Politics, social actors, and increased governmental control in the setting of the minimum wage. European Journal of Industrial Relations.

Darmawan, I. (2017). Pengaruh Status Sosial Ekonomi Dan Lingkungan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Minat Melanjutkan Studi Ke Perguruan Tinggi Pada Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 6(2), 156–165.

Davalagi, S., H., S., Javalkar, S., & S, V. (2024). Socio economic status assessment in India: history and updates for 2024. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health.

Dimou, G., Lamnisos, D., & Giannakou, K. (2020). Development and validation of a social position measure in Greece. European Journal of Public Healt, 30.

Fotaleno, F., & Batubara, D. S. (2024). Fenomena kesulitan Generasi Z dalam mendapatkan pekerjaan ditinjau perspektif teori kesenjangan generasi. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(8), 3199–3208.

Gandasari, D., & Dwidienawati, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s Generation Z.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 pada PT. XL Axiata Tbk. dan PT. Indosat Tbk. Jurnal EMBA, (Edisi 8). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Harjanto, B., Pambudi, N., & S. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092.

Horman, J., Gentry, C., Callahan, C., Anderson, C., Overly, A., Leslie, B., Bickham, C., & King, J. (2021). Generation Z Perceptions of a Positive Workplace Environment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 33, 171 - 187.

Hudík, M. (2019). Two interpretations of the rational choice theory and the relevance of behavioral critique. Rationality and Society, 31, 464 - 489.

Irfan, M., Ruhaya, B., Magfiroh, A., & Rahmat, R. (2023). Formal, Non-formal, and Informal Islamic Education Institutions and Islamic Education Figures in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies.

Jayakani, S., & Lakshmi, S. (2025). From Classroom to Boardroom: How College Education Shapes Career Decision Making in Generasi Z. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.

Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Berita kebijakan ketenagakerjaan.

Khoirunisa, K., & Ramadhani, O. (2025). Generasi Z dan Teknologi : Gaya Hidup Generasi Z di Era Digital. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JUPENDIS).

Kurniawan, A.W., Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pandiva Buku.

Endang, K., Nadifa, N. S., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2024). Systematic Literatur Review (SLR): Pengaruh Determinan Kompetensi, Financial Reward dan Pertimbangan Pasar Kerja terhadap Minat Generasi Z Berkarir Dibidang Perpajakan. Profit: Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 144-158.

Laka, L., Darmansyah, R., Judijanto, L., Lase, J. F. E., Haluti, F., Kuswanti, F., & Kalip, K. (2024). Pendidikan karakter Generasi Z di era digital. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Loe, A., Abdullah, F., & Mardiasih, N. (2022). Faktor Pendorong dan Penarik Migrasi Penduduk di Perkotaan (Kasus Migran Atambua di Kota Malang). Journal of Regional Economics Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.26905/jrei.v3i1.8010.

Majumder, S. (2021). Socioeconomic status scales: Revised Kuppuswamy, BG Prasad, and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2021. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10, 3964 – 3967.

Mushtaq, S., Rather, Z., & Majeed, M. (2022). The Complementarity Between the Formal and Informal Sub-sectors of the Indian Industry. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics.

Na'ilah, N. I., Daeng, A., & Singandaru, A. B. (2025). Analisis Determinan Generasi Z Dalam Memilih Pekerjaan Pertama (Studi Kasus: Fresh Graduate Di Kota Mataram). Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 4(1), 104-120.

Nikoloski, D. (2023). The Role of Efficiency Wages in Determining the Inter-Industry Wage Differentials: Evidence from North Macedonia. Proceedings of the international conference "Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future". https://doi.org/10.47063/ebtsf.2023.0027.

Olsen, J., Abelsen, B., Chen, G., & Lindberg, M. (2022). Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities. BMC Public Health, 22.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 78 Tahun 2015 tentang Pengupahan.

Petković, Z., Ivanova, B., Đorđević, S., Ćorić, B., & Kaputo, J. (2024). ACCOUNTING ASPECT OF INCOME IN FINANCIAL BUSINESS. Oditor. https://doi.org/10.59864/oditor22403zp.

Pratomo, D., & Manning, C. (2022). Structural Change and Formal Sector Employment Growth in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE), 39, 1 - 20. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae39-1a.

Wardono, P., & Hanifah, H. (2020). IDENTIFIKASI FAKTOR PEMBENTUK PERILAKU PENCARI KERJA GENERASI Z DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen.

Welch, F. (1974). Minimum Wage Legislation in the United States. Economic Inquiry, 12(3), 285–318.

Wulandari, D., & Wiharjo, S. (2024). Non-Formal Education Policy in Indonesia. JOURNAL OF MULTI-DISCIPLINES SCIENCE (ICECOMB).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12