ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PREFERENSI DALAM MEMILIH MOTOR HONDA MATIC ATAU MANUAL DI KOTA TIMIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22655509Keywords:
Consumer Preferences, Automatic Motorbikes, Manual Motorbikes, Honda, Product QualityAbstract
Consumer preferences for automatic and manual motorcycles in Timika are the focus of this study, driven by fierce competition in the Indonesian automotive market and Honda’s dominance in the region. Although sales of Honda automatic motorcycles have been higher over the past three years, consumers have different considerations when choosing a motorcycle type. This study aims to analyse the factors influencing consumer preferences, using a quantitative descriptive method. The study population consists of owners of Honda two-wheelers in Timika, with sampling based on the Slovin formula and data collection carried out through observation, questionnaires and documentation. Data analysis was conducted using indicator suitability tests, data adequacy tests and Bartlett’s test for significance, as well as tests for the formation and strength of dominant factors using SPSS. The results of the analysis indicate that price, product quality and tangible evidence were the factors tested, and all were deemed suitable for further analysis. In particular, product quality was identified as the most dominant factor influencing consumer preferences when choosing between Honda automatic and manual motorcycles in Timika, supported by survey data showing a high level of satisfaction with Honda spare parts and authorised service centres.
References
Cahyono, E. (2018). Pengaruh Citra Merek, Harga Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Handphone Merek Oppo Di Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, V(1), 61–75. https://jurnal.amaypk.ac.id/index.php/jbma/article/view/72
Cesariana, C., Juliansyah, F., & Fitriyani, R. (2022). Model Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Kepuasan Konsumen Pada Marketplace : Kualitas Produk Dan Kualitas Pelayanan( Literature Review Manajemen Pemasaran). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v3i1
Harish, A. G., & Wardhana, A. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Pembentuk Preferensi Konsumen Go-Jek Di Kota Jakarta the Analysis of Factors Forming Consumer Preference Go-Jek in Jakarta City. E-Proceeding of Management, 3(2), 2060–2066. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/299909964.pdf
Hendikawati, P. (2011). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Indeks Prestasi Mahasiswa. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 2(1), 27–35. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/kreano/article/viewFile/1243/1289
Ibrahim, M., & Thawil, S. M. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan. Journal of Economic and Management (JECMA), 4(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.46772/jecma.v2i1.513
Kurniawan, B., Wiharna, O., & Permana, T. (2018). Studi Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar pada Mata Pelajaran Teknik Listrik Dasar Otomotif. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 4(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.17509/jmee.v4i2.9627
Metayunika, V. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan (Tangible, Reliabiliy, Responsiveness, Assurance, Dan Emphaty) Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen.
Nasution, A. A. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Harga, Desain Produk, Dan Preferensi Konsumen Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Mobil Mitsubishi Xpander (Studi Kasus Pt. Nusantara Berlian Motor Medan). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 4(3), 158–166. https://simantek.sciencemakarioz.org/index.php/JIK/article/view/175
Nopriansyah. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Harga Dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Sepeda Motor Honda Matic. 2020.
Purnia, D. S., Adiwisastra, M. F., Muhajir, H., & Supriadi, D. (2020). Pengukuran Kesenjangan Digital Menggunakan Metode Deskriptif Berbasis Website. EVOLUSI : Jurnal Sains Dan Manajemen, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/evolusi.v8i2.8942
Wahyudi, N. A. (2021). Analisis Faktor Faktor Preferensi Konsumen Dalam Keputusan Pembelian Booth Boca. Performa, 4(5), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.37715/jp.v4i5.1694
