PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PERILAKU IMPULSE BUYING PADA E-COMMERCE BERBASIS INFLUENCER CREDIBILITY, UGC QUALITY, DAN PRODUCT ATTRACTIVENESS

Authors

  • Ni Putu Meita Krisdayanti Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author
  • Dita Refieta Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author
  • Zahra Syakhira Iswan Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author
  • Erwin Andriano Sianturi Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author
  • Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author
  • Putu Yudi Setiawan Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22655435

Keywords:

Influencer Credibility, User-Generated Content Quality, Product Attractiveness, Urge to Buy Impulsively, Impulse Buying Behavior

Abstract

Social media and live-streaming commerce have created a more interactive shopping environment in which consumers can access information, assess products, and make purchase decisions rapidly. Such an environment may encourage unplanned purchases because consumers are continuously exposed to persuasive cues, including influencer credibility, the quality of user-generated content (UGC), and product attractiveness. Although these factors have been widely discussed, previous research has tended to examine them independently, leaving their combined role in shaping impulse buying insufficiently understood. This study develops a conceptual model linking Influencer Credibility, UGC Quality, and Product Attractiveness to Impulse Buying Behavior, with Urge to Buy Impulsively serving as a mediating variable. A descriptive qualitative literature review was conducted by synthesizing four reputable international journal articles addressing impulse buying in digital marketing and live-streaming commerce. The synthesis suggests that the three factors act as external stimuli capable of activating consumers’ psychological urge to purchase spontaneously. Drawing on the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) Theory and the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), the proposed framework clarifies the process through which marketing stimuli lead to impulse buying behavior. The model also offers theoretical insights and practical considerations for the development of digital marketing strategies.

References

Cheng, J., & Wang, J. (2025). Influencer-product attractiveness transference in interactive fashion marketing: The moderated moderating effect of speciesism against AI. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

Feng, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Wu, M., & Yang, Q. (2024). Impulse buying behavior during livestreaming: Moderating effects of scarcity persuasion and price perception. Heliyon, 10(6), e28347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28347

Gong, X., & Jiang, X. (2023). Understanding consumer impulse buying in livestreaming commerce: The product involvement perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1104349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104349

Hidayat, R., et al. (2025). How User-Generated Content Affects Consumer Trust and Purchase Intentions in Social Commerce.

Huo, C., Zhang, M., & Ma, F. (2023). The influence of livestreaming characteristics on consumers' impulse buying behavior: Evidence from e-commerce platforms. Frontiers in Psychology.

Huo, C., Wang, X., Sadiq, M. W., & Pang, M. (2023). Exploring factors affecting consumer’s impulse buying behavior in live-streaming shopping: An interactive research based upon SOR model. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231172678

Jiang, S., Xu, J., & Wang, X. (2024). What influences users' continuous behavioral intention in cultural heritage virtual tourism? An integration of Stimulus–Organism–Response theory and experience economy. Sustainability, 16(23), 10231.

Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232.

Kim, H., & Park, M. (2023). Virtual influencers' attractiveness effect on purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of the product–endorser fit with the brand. Computers in Human Behavior.

Kostić, S. (2026). The Role of User-Generated Content in Social Commerce. Sustainability, 18(3), 1601.

Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2022). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust and purchase intention. Journal of Interactive Advertising.

Luo, X., Cheah, J.-H., Hollebeek, L. D., & Lim, X.-J. (2024). Boosting customers’ impulsive buying tendency in live-streaming commerce: The role of customer engagement and deal proneness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103644

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.

Sokolova, K., & Perez, C. (2021). You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, credibility, and attractiveness influence intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102276.

Soler-Anguiano, F. L., Zeelenberg, M., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2023). The interaction of product attractiveness and decision-making style on consumer purchase intention: A cultural moderation perspective. Journal of International Consumer Marketing.

Van Dat, N. (2025). User-Generated Content, Online Trust, and Purchase Intention. The Messenger.

Xiao, E., Su, C., Lu, L., Qin, R., Li, Z., & Wang, D. (2026). Factors affecting impulse buying behavior in the context of e-commerce live streaming. Acta Psychologica, 262, 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106183

Zhao, K., & Teo, P. C. (2023). The adoption of Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) model in the social commerce literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 1879–1886.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08