REVOLUSI KESEJAHTERAAN: MENUJU PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI INKLUSIF DAN PENURUNAN TINGKAT KEMISKINAN DI KALIMANTAN TENGAH

Authors

  • Risdayanti Risdayanti Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis, Universitas Palangka Raya Author
  • Alexandra Hukom Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis, Universitas Palangka Raya Author

Keywords:

Prosperity, Inclusive Economic Growth, Reducing Poverty Levels, Central Kalimantan

Abstract

Central Kalimantan, with its abundant natural resources, is still trapped in a cycle of poverty. A new strategy is needed to encourage inclusive and sustainable economic growth, while reducing poverty levels in this region. The aim of this research is to determine the factors that influence inclusive economic growth in Central Kalimantan. The research method used is quantitative using a path analysis approach. The research results show that variable X1 has a t-statistic value of 3,363 with a Prob value. (significance) of 0.0014 (<0.05), it can be concluded that variable X1 has a direct influence on the intervening variable Y1, meaning that the human development index directly influences the level of inclusive economic growth in Central Kalimantan. Meanwhile, the variable X2 has a t-statistic of -1.551 with a prob value. (significance) of 0.1268 (>0.05), this value is more than 0.05, meaning that labor absorption has no direct effect on inclusive economic growth in Central Kalimantan. Variable Y1 (Intervening) has a t-statistic value of 5.622 with a Prob value. (Significance) is 0.0000 (<0.05), so it can be concluded that variable Y1 (Intervening) has a significant or direct effect on the dependent variable. Furthermore, the Adjusted R-squared value is 1.159, so it can be concluded that the contribution of the variables X1, X2 & Y1 (Intervening) to the dependent variable Y2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, I. (2007). Inequality and the Imperative for Inclusive Growth in Asia. Asian Development, Review, Vol. 24 (2), pp. 1-16.

Arsyad, L. (1999). Pengantar Perencanaan dan pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah, Edisi Pertama. Arsyad, L. (2004). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta.: STIE YKPN.

Badrudin, R. (2012). Ekonomika Otonomi Daerah. . Yogyakarta:UPP STIM YKPN.

BPS. (2015). Badan Pusat Statistik Jakarta Pusat, Pedoman Pendataan Survei Penduduk Antar Sensus 2005. Jakarta Pusat : Badan Pusat Statistik.

Elizabeth, & Stanton. (2007). The Human Development Index: A History. Working Paper Series Number 127. Global Development and Environment Institute.

Ghozali. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. .

Hasibuan, I. W. (2022). Pengaruh Jumlah Penduduk, Tingkat Kesehatan Dan Pendidikan Terhadap Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat.PROFJES: Profetik Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 1(1), 315–333.

Hidayat, A., & Hukom, A. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, IPM, Dan Pengangguran Di Kalimantan Tengah Pada Tahun 2010-2019, SAMMAJIVA : Jurnal Penelitian Bisnis dan Manajemene-ISSN: 2985-9611; p-ISSN: 2986-0415, Hal 11-20.

Hidayat, A., & Hukom, A. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, IPM, Dan Pengangguran, 11-20.

Kasim, M. (2006). Karakteristik Kemiskinan dan Penanggulangannya. Lipsye, d. (1992). Pengantar Makroekonomi. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Prisilia Monika Polandos, D. S. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Modal, Lama Usaha, Dan Jumlah Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Pendapatan Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah Di Kecamatan Langowan Timur.

Safitri, I. (2016). Pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah sektor kesehatan, pendidikan, dan infrastruktur terhadap indeks pembangunan manusia di Provinsi Aceh.Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi 1(1), 66–76.

Siamanjuntak, D. P. (2013). Pengantar Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia.

Singh, K. D. (2017). Inclusive Growth and Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 579–594.

Sukirno, S. (2006). Ekonomi Pembangunan Proses, Masalah, dan Dasar Kebijakan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta : Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26